Skip to main content
Log in

Seed coat anatomy ofCeratozamia mexicana (Cycadales)

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seed coat furnishes protection with a thick cuticle, tannin cells, mucilage, and a hard sclerotesta. The external layer of the seed coat is a sarcotesta; a thick cuticle covers the external walls of its epidermal cells. This epidermis bears stomates and, in the early stages, trichomes. The subepidermal cells have druses. Starch grains are abundant in the sarcotesta from June through August, but they disappear during dispersal in September. The parenchyma is interrupted by mucilage canals lined by epithelial cells. Tannin cells are found in the sarcotesta, sclerotesta, and pachychalaza. Ten sectors of an areole in the sclerotesta around the micropyle may correspond to the tips of the integumentary segments in some fossil plants, such asGenomosperma kidstonii.

Resumen

La cubierta seminal le imparte protección a la semilla mediante una cutícula gruesa, células de taninos, mucílago, y una esclerotesta dura. La capa externa de la cubierta seminal es la sarcotesta; una cutícula gruesa cubre las paredes externas de las células epidérmicas. Esta epidermis presenta estomas y, en etapas tempranas, tricomas. Cuando la esclerotesta se endurece, los tricomas desaparecen. Las células subepidérmicas presentan drusas. En la sarcotesta los granos de almidón son abundantes desde junio hasta agosto, pero desaparecen durante la dispersión en septiembre. El parénquima se interrumpe por canales de mucílago forrados por células epiteliales. Las células de taninos se encuentran en la sarcotesta, esclerotesta, y paquicálaza. Diez sectores de una areola en la esclerotesta alrededor del micrópilo podrían corresponder a los apéndices del tegumento en algunas plantas fósiles, comoGenomosperma kidstonii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Beitrán, J. &L. Torres-Hernández. 1995. Aspectos cualitativos de la herbivoría deEumaeus debora Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) sobreCeralozamia mexicana Brongn. (Cycadales: Zamiaceae). La Ciencia y el Hombre 19: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. 1904.Telangium scottii, a new species ofTelangium showing structure. Ann. Bot. 18: 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C. J. 1935. Gymnosperms: Structure and evolution. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, P. R. 1988. Major clades and relationships in the “higher” gymnosperms. Pp. 218–272in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, H. R. M. 1920. Contribution to the knowledge of the morphological value and phylogeny of the ovule and its integuments. Recl. Trav. bot. néerl. 17: 219–324. [Original not seen]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehgan, B. &C. R. Johnson. 1983. Improved seed germination ofZamia floridana (sensu lato) with H2SO4 and GA3. Scientia Hort. 19: 357–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — &B. Schutzman. 1983. Effect of H2SO4 and GA3 on seed germination ofZamia furfuracea. HortScience 18(3): 371–371.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. Ed. 2. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenari, M. 1984. Seed physiology: From ovule to maturing seed. Bot. Rev. 50: 143–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahn, A. &A. H. Werker. 1972. Anatomical mechanisms of seed dispersal. Pp. 1: 151–221in T. T. Kozlowski (ed.), Seed biology. Academic Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Christen, A. 1990. Algunas interacciones entreDioon edule (Zamiaceae) yPeromyscus mexicamis (Rodentia:Cricetidae). La Ciencia y el Hombre 5: 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, H. &C. Mez. 1904. Das Mikroskop und seine Anwendung. Ed. 9. Julius Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jernstedt, J. A. &C. Clark. 1979. Stomata on the fruits and seeds ofEschscholzia (Papaveraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 66: 586–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. L. 1993. Cycads of the world: Ancient plants in today’s landscape. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P. C., A. M. Wadhawani &B. M. Johri. 1967. Morphological and embryological studies onGossypium L. Proc. Nat. Inst. India, Pt. B, Biol. Sci. 33: 37–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, P. &P. R. Crane. 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants: A cladistic study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, P. G., S. W. Connell &B. Harris. 1993. Seed toxicity inMacrozamia riedlei. Pp. 37–41in D. W. Stevenson & K. J. Norstog (eds.), The biology, structure, and systematics of the Cycadales: Proceedings of CYCAD 90, the Second International Conference on Cycad Biology. Palm & Cycad Societies of Australia Cycads, Milton, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRue, C. D. 1948. Regeneration in the megagametophyte ofZamia floridana. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 75: 597–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loconte, H. &D. W. Stevenson. 1990. Cladistics of the spermatophyta. Brittonia 42: 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locquin, M. & M. Langeron. 1985. Manual de microscopía. Editorial Labor, Barcelona, Spain. [Translated from the French]

  • Meeuse, A. D. J. &F. Bouman. 1974. The inner integument: Its probable origin and homology. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23(3): 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyen, S. V. 1984. Basic features of gymnosperm systematics and phylogeny as evidenced by the fossil record. Bot. Rev. 50: 1–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norstog, K. 1990. Studies of cycad reproduction at Fairchild Tropical Garden. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, D. D. 1973.Cycas and Cycadales. Central Book Depot, Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. D. Nautiyal. 1963. Cuticle and epidermis of recent Cycadales: Leaves, sporangia and seeds. Senckenberg. Biol. 44(4): 257–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, E. 1925. Stony layer in seeds of gymnosperms. Bot. Gaz. 59: 121–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G. W. &S. E. Scheckler. 1988. Biology of ancestral gymnosperms. Pp. 85–134in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, J. E. 1958. Botanical microtechnique. Ed. 3. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R. 1986. Cornerian and other terminology of angiospermous and gymnospermous seed coats: Historical perspective and terminological recommendation. Taxon 35(3): 476–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. 1978. Embryology of Gymnosperms: Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. Band X. Teil 2. Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &B. M. Johri. 1972. Development of gymnosperm seeds. 1: 21–75in T. T. Kozlowski (ed.), Seed biology. Academic Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. S. 1978. Seed scarification to speed germination of ornamental cycads (Zamia spp.) L. HortScience 13(4): 436–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporne, K. R. 1965. The morphology of gymnosperms. Ed. 2. Hutchinson Univ. Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D. W. 1981. Observations on ptyxis, phenology, and trichomes in the Cycadales and their systematic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 68(8): 1104–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Morphology and systematics of the Cycadales. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 8–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. N. 1983. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L. 1981. Flowering plants: Origin and dispersal. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India; Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Koenigstein, Germany. [Translated from the Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vovides, A. P. 1991. Cone idioblasts of eleven cycad genera: Morphology, distribution, and significance. Bot. Gaz. 152(1): 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,K. J. Norstog, P. K. S. Fawcett, M. W. Duncan, R. J. Nash &D. V. Molsen. 1993. Histological changes during maturation in male and female cones of the cycadZamia furfuracea and their significance in relation to pollination biology. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 111: 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, W. 1952. Main results of the “Telome Theory”. The Palaeobotanist 1: 456–470.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SÁnchez-Tinoco, M.Y., Engleman, E.M. Seed coat anatomy ofCeratozamia mexicana (Cycadales). Bot. Rev 70, 24–38 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0024:SCAOCM]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0024:SCAOCM]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation